Add regression line equation and R^2 on graph

RGgplot2Linear RegressionR Faq

R Problem Overview


I wonder how to add regression line equation and R^2 on the ggplot. My code is:

library(ggplot2)

df <- data.frame(x = c(1:100))
df$y <- 2 + 3 * df$x + rnorm(100, sd = 40)
p <- ggplot(data = df, aes(x = x, y = y)) +
            geom_smooth(method = "lm", se=FALSE, color="black", formula = y ~ x) +
            geom_point()
p

Any help will be highly appreciated.

R Solutions


Solution 1 - R

Here is one solution

# GET EQUATION AND R-SQUARED AS STRING
# SOURCE: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ggplot2/1TgH-kG5XMA

lm_eqn <- function(df){
	m <- lm(y ~ x, df);
	eq <- substitute(italic(y) == a + b %.% italic(x)*","~~italic(r)^2~"="~r2, 
         list(a = format(unname(coef(m)[1]), digits = 2),
              b = format(unname(coef(m)[2]), digits = 2),
             r2 = format(summary(m)$r.squared, digits = 3)))
    as.character(as.expression(eq));
}

p1 <- p + geom_text(x = 25, y = 300, label = lm_eqn(df), parse = TRUE)

EDIT. I figured out the source from where I picked this code. Here is the link to the original post in the ggplot2 google groups

Output

Solution 2 - R

I included a statistics stat_poly_eq() in my package ggpmisc that allows this answer:

library(ggplot2)
library(ggpmisc)
df <- data.frame(x = c(1:100))
df$y <- 2 + 3 * df$x + rnorm(100, sd = 40)
my.formula <- y ~ x
p <- ggplot(data = df, aes(x = x, y = y)) +
   geom_smooth(method = "lm", se=FALSE, color="black", formula = my.formula) +
   stat_poly_eq(formula = my.formula, 
                aes(label = paste(..eq.label.., ..rr.label.., sep = "~~~")), 
                parse = TRUE) +         
   geom_point()
p

enter image description here

This statistic works with any polynomial with no missing terms, and hopefully has enough flexibility to be generally useful. The R^2 or adjusted R^2 labels can be used with any model formula fitted with lm(). Being a ggplot statistic it behaves as expected both with groups and facets.

The 'ggpmisc' package is available through CRAN.

Version 0.2.6 was just accepted to CRAN.

It addresses comments by @shabbychef and @MYaseen208.

@MYaseen208 this shows how to add a hat.

library(ggplot2)
library(ggpmisc)
df <- data.frame(x = c(1:100))
df$y <- 2 + 3 * df$x + rnorm(100, sd = 40)
my.formula <- y ~ x
p <- ggplot(data = df, aes(x = x, y = y)) +
   geom_smooth(method = "lm", se=FALSE, color="black", formula = my.formula) +
   stat_poly_eq(formula = my.formula,
                eq.with.lhs = "italic(hat(y))~`=`~",
                aes(label = paste(..eq.label.., ..rr.label.., sep = "~~~")), 
                parse = TRUE) +         
   geom_point()
p

enter image description here

@shabbychef Now it is possible to match the variables in the equation to those used for the axis-labels. To replace the x with say z and y with h one would use:

p <- ggplot(data = df, aes(x = x, y = y)) +
   geom_smooth(method = "lm", se=FALSE, color="black", formula = my.formula) +
   stat_poly_eq(formula = my.formula,
                eq.with.lhs = "italic(h)~`=`~",
                eq.x.rhs = "~italic(z)",
                aes(label = ..eq.label..), 
                parse = TRUE) + 
   labs(x = expression(italic(z)), y = expression(italic(h))) +          
   geom_point()
p

enter image description here

Being these normal R parsed expressions greek letters can now also be used both in the lhs and rhs of the equation.

[2017-03-08] @elarry Edit to more precisely address the original question, showing how to add a comma between the equation- and R2-labels.

p <- ggplot(data = df, aes(x = x, y = y)) +
  geom_smooth(method = "lm", se=FALSE, color="black", formula = my.formula) +
  stat_poly_eq(formula = my.formula,
               eq.with.lhs = "italic(hat(y))~`=`~",
               aes(label = paste(..eq.label.., ..rr.label.., sep = "*plain(\",\")~")), 
               parse = TRUE) +         
  geom_point()
p

enter image description here

[2019-10-20] @helen.h I give below examples of use of stat_poly_eq() with grouping.

library(ggpmisc)
df <- data.frame(x = c(1:100))
df$y <- 20 * c(0, 1) + 3 * df$x + rnorm(100, sd = 40)
df$group <- factor(rep(c("A", "B"), 50))
my.formula <- y ~ x
p <- ggplot(data = df, aes(x = x, y = y, colour = group)) +
  geom_smooth(method = "lm", se=FALSE, formula = my.formula) +
  stat_poly_eq(formula = my.formula, 
               aes(label = paste(..eq.label.., ..rr.label.., sep = "~~~")), 
               parse = TRUE) +         
  geom_point()
p

p <- ggplot(data = df, aes(x = x, y = y, linetype = group)) +
  geom_smooth(method = "lm", se=FALSE, formula = my.formula) +
  stat_poly_eq(formula = my.formula, 
               aes(label = paste(..eq.label.., ..rr.label.., sep = "~~~")), 
               parse = TRUE) +         
  geom_point()
p

enter image description here

enter image description here

[2020-01-21] @Herman It may be a bit counter-intuitive at first sight, but to obtain a single equation when using grouping one needs to follow the grammar of graphics. Either restrict the mapping that creates the grouping to individual layers (shown below) or keep the default mapping and override it with a constant value in the layer where you do not want the grouping (e.g. colour = "black").

Continuing from previous example.

p <- ggplot(data = df, aes(x = x, y = y)) +
  geom_smooth(method = "lm", se=FALSE, formula = my.formula) +
  stat_poly_eq(formula = my.formula, 
               aes(label = paste(..eq.label.., ..rr.label.., sep = "~~~")), 
               parse = TRUE) +         
  geom_point(aes(colour = group))
p

enter image description here

[2020-01-22] For the sake of completeness an example with facets, demonstrating that also in this case the expectations of the grammar of graphics are fulfilled.

library(ggpmisc)
df <- data.frame(x = c(1:100))
df$y <- 20 * c(0, 1) + 3 * df$x + rnorm(100, sd = 40)
df$group <- factor(rep(c("A", "B"), 50))
my.formula <- y ~ x

p <- ggplot(data = df, aes(x = x, y = y)) +
  geom_smooth(method = "lm", se=FALSE, formula = my.formula) +
  stat_poly_eq(formula = my.formula, 
               aes(label = paste(..eq.label.., ..rr.label.., sep = "~~~")), 
               parse = TRUE) +         
  geom_point() +
  facet_wrap(~group)
p

enter image description here

Solution 3 - R

I changed a few lines of the source of stat_smooth and related functions to make a new function that adds the fit equation and R squared value. This will work on facet plots too!

library(devtools)
source_gist("524eade46135f6348140")
df = data.frame(x = c(1:100))
df$y = 2 + 5 * df$x + rnorm(100, sd = 40)
df$class = rep(1:2,50)
ggplot(data = df, aes(x = x, y = y, label=y)) +
  stat_smooth_func(geom="text",method="lm",hjust=0,parse=TRUE) +
  geom_smooth(method="lm",se=FALSE) +
  geom_point() + facet_wrap(~class)

enter image description here

I used the code in @Ramnath's answer to format the equation. The stat_smooth_func function isn't very robust, but it shouldn't be hard to play around with it.

https://gist.github.com/kdauria/524eade46135f6348140. Try updating ggplot2 if you get an error.

Solution 4 - R

I've modified Ramnath's post to a) make more generic so it accepts a linear model as a parameter rather than the data frame and b) displays negatives more appropriately.

lm_eqn = function(m) {

  l <- list(a = format(coef(m)[1], digits = 2),
      b = format(abs(coef(m)[2]), digits = 2),
      r2 = format(summary(m)$r.squared, digits = 3));

  if (coef(m)[2] >= 0)  {
    eq <- substitute(italic(y) == a + b %.% italic(x)*","~~italic(r)^2~"="~r2,l)
  } else {
    eq <- substitute(italic(y) == a - b %.% italic(x)*","~~italic(r)^2~"="~r2,l)    
  }

  as.character(as.expression(eq));                 
}

Usage would change to:

p1 = p + geom_text(aes(x = 25, y = 300, label = lm_eqn(lm(y ~ x, df))), parse = TRUE)

Solution 5 - R

Here's the most simplest code for everyone

Note: Showing Pearson's Rho and not R^2.

library(ggplot2)
library(ggpubr)

df <- data.frame(x = c(1:100)
df$y <- 2 + 3 * df$x + rnorm(100, sd = 40)
p <- ggplot(data = df, aes(x = x, y = y)) +
        geom_smooth(method = "lm", se=FALSE, color="black", formula = y ~ x) +
        geom_point()+
        stat_cor(label.y = 35)+ #this means at 35th unit in the y axis, the r squared and p value will be shown
        stat_regline_equation(label.y = 30) #this means at 30th unit regresion line equation will be shown

p

One such example with my own dataset

Solution 6 - R

Using ggpubr:

library(ggpubr)

# reproducible data
set.seed(1)
df <- data.frame(x = c(1:100))
df$y <- 2 + 3 * df$x + rnorm(100, sd = 40)

# By default showing Pearson R
ggscatter(df, x = "x", y = "y", add = "reg.line") +
  stat_cor(label.y = 300) +
  stat_regline_equation(label.y = 280)

enter image description here

# Use R2 instead of R
ggscatter(df, x = "x", y = "y", add = "reg.line") +
  stat_cor(label.y = 300, 
           aes(label = paste(..rr.label.., ..p.label.., sep = "~`,`~"))) +
  stat_regline_equation(label.y = 280)

## compare R2 with accepted answer
# m <- lm(y ~ x, df)
# round(summary(m)$r.squared, 2)
# [1] 0.85

enter image description here

Solution 7 - R

really love @Ramnath solution. To allow use to customize the regression formula (instead of fixed as y and x as literal variable names), and added the p-value into the printout as well (as @Jerry T commented), here is the mod:

lm_eqn <- function(df, y, x){
    formula = as.formula(sprintf('%s ~ %s', y, x))
    m <- lm(formula, data=df);
    # formating the values into a summary string to print out
    # ~ give some space, but equal size and comma need to be quoted
    eq <- substitute(italic(target) == a + b %.% italic(input)*","~~italic(r)^2~"="~r2*","~~p~"="~italic(pvalue), 
         list(target = y,
              input = x,
              a = format(as.vector(coef(m)[1]), digits = 2), 
              b = format(as.vector(coef(m)[2]), digits = 2), 
             r2 = format(summary(m)$r.squared, digits = 3),
             # getting the pvalue is painful
             pvalue = format(summary(m)$coefficients[2,'Pr(>|t|)'], digits=1)
            )
          )
    as.character(as.expression(eq));                 
}

geom_point() +
  ggrepel::geom_text_repel(label=rownames(mtcars)) +
  geom_text(x=3,y=300,label=lm_eqn(mtcars, 'hp','wt'),color='red',parse=T) +
  geom_smooth(method='lm')

enter image description here Unfortunately, this doesn't work with facet_wrap or facet_grid.

Solution 8 - R

Inspired by the equation style provided in this answer, a more generic approach (more than one predictor + latex output as option) can be:

print_equation= function(model, latex= FALSE, ...){
    dots <- list(...)
    cc= model$coefficients
    var_sign= as.character(sign(cc[-1]))%>%gsub("1","",.)%>%gsub("-"," - ",.)
    var_sign[var_sign==""]= ' + '
    
    f_args_abs= f_args= dots
    f_args$x= cc
    f_args_abs$x= abs(cc)
    cc_= do.call(format, args= f_args)
    cc_abs= do.call(format, args= f_args_abs)
    pred_vars=
        cc_abs%>%
        paste(., x_vars, sep= star)%>%
        paste(var_sign,.)%>%paste(., collapse= "")

    if(latex){
        star= " \\cdot "
        y_var= strsplit(as.character(model$call$formula), "~")[[2]]%>%
            paste0("\\hat{",.,"_{i}}")
        x_vars= names(cc_)[-1]%>%paste0(.,"_{i}")
    }else{
        star= " * "
        y_var= strsplit(as.character(model$call$formula), "~")[[2]]        
        x_vars= names(cc_)[-1]
    }

    equ= paste(y_var,"=",cc_[1],pred_vars)
    if(latex){
        equ= paste0(equ," + \\hat{\\varepsilon_{i}} \\quad where \\quad \\varepsilon \\sim \\mathcal{N}(0,",
                    summary(MetamodelKdifEryth)$sigma,")")%>%paste0("$",.,"$")
    }
    cat(equ)
}

The model argument expects an lm object, the latex argument is a boolean to ask for a simple character or a latex-formated equation, and the ... argument pass its values to the format function.

I also added an option to output it as latex so you can use this function in a rmarkdown like this:

    
```{r echo=FALSE, results='asis'}
print_equation(model = lm_mod, latex = TRUE)
```

Now using it:

df <- data.frame(x = c(1:100))
df$y <- 2 + 3 * df$x + rnorm(100, sd = 40)
df$z <- 8 + 3 * df$x + rnorm(100, sd = 40)
lm_mod= lm(y~x+z, data = df)

print_equation(model = lm_mod, latex = FALSE)

This code yields: y = 11.3382963933174 + 2.5893419 * x + 0.1002227 * z

And if we ask for a latex equation, rounding the parameters to 3 digits:

print_equation(model = lm_mod, latex = TRUE, digits= 3)

This yields: latex equation

Solution 9 - R

Another option would be to create a custom function generating the equation using dplyr and broom libraries:

get_formula <- function(model) {
  
  broom::tidy(model)[, 1:2] %>%
    mutate(sign = ifelse(sign(estimate) == 1, ' + ', ' - ')) %>% #coeff signs
    mutate_if(is.numeric, ~ abs(round(., 2))) %>% #for improving formatting
    mutate(a = ifelse(term == '(Intercept)', paste0('y ~ ', estimate), paste0(sign, estimate, ' * ', term))) %>%
    summarise(formula = paste(a, collapse = '')) %>%
    as.character
  
}

lm(y ~ x, data = df) -> model
get_formula(model)
#"y ~ 6.22 + 3.16 * x"

scales::percent(summary(model)$r.squared, accuracy = 0.01) -> r_squared

Now we need to add the text to the plot:

p + 
  geom_text(x = 20, y = 300,
            label = get_formula(model),
            color = 'red') +
  geom_text(x = 20, y = 285,
            label = r_squared,
            color = 'blue')

plot

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionMYaseen208View Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - RRamnathView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - RPedro J. AphaloView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 3 - RkdauriaView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 4 - RJaydenView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 5 - RSork-kalView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 6 - Rzx8754View Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 7 - RX.XView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 8 - RrvezyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 9 - RAlexBView Answer on Stackoverflow