A Task's exception(s) were not observed either by Waiting on the Task or accessing its Exception property. As a result, the unobserved exception was

C#WpfExceptionTaskTask Parallel-Library

C# Problem Overview


What does this mean and how to resolve it?

I am using TPL tasks.

The whole error

> A Task's exception(s) were not observed either by Waiting on the Task or accessing its Exception property. As a result, the unobserved exception was rethrown by the finalizer thread.

> at System.Threading.Tasks.TaskExceptionHolder.Finalize()

> mscorlib

C# Solutions


Solution 1 - C#

If you create a Task, and you don't ever call task.Wait() or try to retrieve the result of a Task<T>, when the task is collected by the garbage collector, it will tear down your application during finalization. For details, see MSDN's page on Exception Handling in the TPL.

The best option here is to "handle" the exception. This can be done via a continuation - you can attach a continuation to the task, and log/swallow/etc the exception that occurs. This provides a clean way to log task exceptions, and can be written as a simple extension method, ie:

public static void LogExceptions(this Task task)
{
    task.ContinueWith( t =>
    {
         var aggException = t.Exception.Flatten();
         foreach(var exception in aggException.InnerExceptions)
             LogException(exception);
    }, 
    TaskContinuationOptions.OnlyOnFaulted);
}

With the above, you can prevent any task from tearing down the app, and logging it, via:

Task.Factory.StartNew( () => 
   { 
       // Do your work...
   }).LogExceptions();

Alternatively, you can subscribe to the TaskScheduler.UnobservedTaskException and handle it there.

Solution 2 - C#

Sure; it means a Task got finalized after being left to garbage collection, but the task itself failed. There are two fixes:

  • handle the tasks fail directly (use ContinueWith(...) to subscribe, and check .IsFaulted and .Exception on the Task in the parameter)
  • handle the TaskScheduler.UnobservedTaskException event, and mark it observed (call e.SetObserved() after logging the error)

Attributions

All content for this solution is sourced from the original question on Stackoverflow.

The content on this page is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

Content TypeOriginal AuthorOriginal Content on Stackoverflow
QuestionMonsterMMORPGView Question on Stackoverflow
Solution 1 - C#Reed CopseyView Answer on Stackoverflow
Solution 2 - C#Marc GravellView Answer on Stackoverflow